Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Skip to content

Vendor Due Diligence on a Metro Fiber Network

Client Case Study

Our client’s situation:

Our client was seeking to divest a metro fiber network. A draft Information Memorandum had been produced and the client now recognized that a detailed technical assessment of the assets would benefit the sale process. Specifically, the client wanted to present a clear story on the technical quality and capacity of the network.

How we approached the issue:

Cartesian understood that the value to potential buyers was in the network’s coverage, the connected buildings (including data centers), and its capacity for expansion. To build a compelling narrative around this data would require a team composed of our in-house network experts and geospatial analysts.

What we did to help:

Cartesian’s team structured the diligence in three workstreams: one focused on the quality of the network; a second on the coverage and capacity; and the third, considering network operations. In the first workstream, we reviewed the client’s construction specifications for its ducts, chambers, and fiber. We also examined a sample of chambers for evidence that these were well-maintained, and that good installation practice had been adhered to. The second workstream focused on the client’s duct and cable routes. Here, the team worked with GIS data, inventory records, and network schematics to build a holistic view of the network topology, coverage and utilization. Using our in-house geospatial tools, the team analyzed this information and produced easy-to-understand visualizations that clearly demonstrated the current scope of the network and its future potential. In the third workstream, network operations were assessed through a combination of document review and management interviews. The scope included service delivery, service assurance, security practices, quality management, and operational KPIs.

The end result:

Cartesian synthesized its findings in a vendor due diligence report that clearly set out the technical characteristics of the network and the available capacity by network segment. Our report provided a level of detail beyond the IM, with the inherent authority of an independent expert assessment. In addition to the VDD report, our client was also able to share the output data sets from our GIS analysis with prospective buyers.

Get in Touch

Loading...